Study: Electric Buses 82% More Profitable Compared with Diesel

Posted by Lauren Tyler on March 28, 2016 1 Comment
Categories : Up Front

A new study from the Indian Institute of Science says that electric buses generate up to 27% more revenue and 82% more profits compared with the diesel buses they replace, reports Charged EVs. This is in addition to the estimated 25 tons of carbon dioxide emissions that electric buses remove from the atmosphere when replacing a diesel bus.

The study centered on the Indian city of Bangalore, where a Chinese-built BYD electric bus was tested on existing routes around the city. Researchers studied the electric bus’ environmental and economic impact, finding that it cost much less to both fuel and maintain the electric bus.

The U.S. National Renewable Energy Laboratory recently conducted its own study that showed electric buses to be nearly four times more fuel-efficient than CNG buses. Electric buses are substantially more expensive to buy initially, but they have significantly lower energy and fueling costs.

For example, the BYD K9 electric bus costs about $550,000 to purchase, while a typical diesel bus costs around $450,000. However, the Society of Automotive Engineers conducted a test that found the BYD electric bus cost just $0.20 to $0.30 per mile to operate compared with about $1.40 per mile for an equivalent diesel or CNG bus in New York City.

Register here to receive our Latest Headlines email newsletter

Comments

  1. To call this a “study” is ridiculous.

    1) All of the data is based on one brand new electric bus provided by the bus manufacturer. Was it a standard road vehicle, or a “special” bus they use for tests? The study doesn’t say.

    2) All that is mentioned is the diesel bus used in the study was a legacy bus. Was it 5 years old, 10, 15? What emissions standard did it adhere too? Being it was a legacy bus, what was its service history? The study doesn’t say.

    3) As Kamil Kaluski noted in his critcial analyis of the “study”, most importantly, the study completely ignores several important cost factors. The overhead and capital costs associated with running and maintaining a fleet of electric buses is completely omitted.

    Also omitted is the recharge time and charging locations. To accommodate an electric bus fleet, significant capital improvements would need to be made to any existing bus facilities. Charging stations would need to be added in garages, along the bus routes, and/or route terminals. The amount of charging stations and their locations would vary greatly by route length, charge time, vehicle quantity, and the maximum range of the electric buses.

    Likewise, service and maintenance facilities would need to be suited toward electric vehicles with power connections. Personnel working in those facilities would need to be trained to work on electric buses or additional personnel would need to be hired. The cost of these capital improvements would be immensely significant, especially from an ROI point of view, and the study did not address it at all.

    4) In a brilliant move, however, the amount of money each bus accumulated in fares was included.

    To compare a brand new electric bus to an older diesel bus is bad enough. But to omit the basic expenses required in operating an electrical system is utterly ridiculous.

    Steve Hansen – Diesel Technology Forum

Leave a Comment